To expand on my previous answer, one of the toughest parts of wedding 
photography is preserving texture in the white wedding gown without relegating 
the groom's black tux to shadow hell. I haven't had a lot of problems with this 
in the past, but EDR will be a plus in this regard.
Paul
 -------------- Original message ----------------------
From: Angel Ramos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sorry. Should say:
> . . . use the camera in normal mode?
> Angel
> 
> Angel Ramos wrote:
> > Paul,
> > If you were doing or work in weddings would you use this function or you 
> > would use the camera in nomal mode?
> > Angel
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >   
> >> It's active for RAW files. You can select it in the ISO function screen. 
> >> It 
> limits the range of choices, eliminating ISO 100 and ISO6399. This apparently 
> has something to do with using that capacity to exend the range. 
> >> Paul
> >>  -------------- Original message ----------------------
> >> From: "George Sinos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>   
> >>     
> >>> Paul -
> >>>
> >>> Is the extended dynamic range active for raw files or is it part of
> >>> the processing for a jpg?
> >>>
> >>> Thanks, gs
> >>>
> >>> On Sat, Jun 21, 2008 at 8:25 AM, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
> wrote:
> >>>     
> >>>       
> >>>> To Roman's point about extended dynamic range. I shoot in that mode
> >>>> almost continuously. About the only time I turn it off is if I need
> >>>> ISO 100 or 6400, and those times are rare. I've noticed considerably
> >>>> improvement in dynamic range over the K10D, but I was still surprised
> >>>> to see sky tones in this shot. In fact, I cropped it to leave a touch
> >>>> of blue at the top, although the part of the sky in frame was
> >>>> primarily white cloud. Thought it would be a complete burnout. There
> >>>> is a bit of flash fill here, which helps by boosting the foreground.
> >>>> But it's minimal as the shot is at 135mm, and the subject is quite
> >>>> distant. f3.2, 1/1250, ISO 200.
> >>>> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=7434474
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> >>>> [email protected]
> >>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> >>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
> follow 
> >>>>       
> >>>>         
> >>> the directions.
> >>>     
> >>> -- 
> >>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> >>> [email protected]
> >>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> >>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
> follow 
> >>> the directions.
> >>>     
> >>>       
> >>   
> >>     
> >
> >   
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to