Excellent!,
Thank you Paul.
Angel

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> To expand on my previous answer, one of the toughest parts of wedding 
> photography is preserving texture in the white wedding gown without 
> relegating the groom's black tux to shadow hell. I haven't had a lot of 
> problems with this in the past, but EDR will be a plus in this regard.
> Paul
>  -------------- Original message ----------------------
> From: Angel Ramos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>   
>> Sorry. Should say:
>> . . . use the camera in normal mode?
>> Angel
>>
>> Angel Ramos wrote:
>>     
>>> Paul,
>>> If you were doing or work in weddings would you use this function or you 
>>> would use the camera in nomal mode?
>>> Angel
>>>
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>>   
>>>       
>>>> It's active for RAW files. You can select it in the ISO function screen. 
>>>> It 
>>>>         
>> limits the range of choices, eliminating ISO 100 and ISO6399. This 
>> apparently 
>> has something to do with using that capacity to exend the range. 
>>     
>>>> Paul
>>>>  -------------- Original message ----------------------
>>>> From: "George Sinos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>   
>>>>     
>>>>         
>>>>> Paul -
>>>>>
>>>>> Is the extended dynamic range active for raw files or is it part of
>>>>> the processing for a jpg?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks, gs
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, Jun 21, 2008 at 8:25 AM, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
>>>>>           
>> wrote:
>>     
>>>>>     
>>>>>       
>>>>>           
>>>>>> To Roman's point about extended dynamic range. I shoot in that mode
>>>>>> almost continuously. About the only time I turn it off is if I need
>>>>>> ISO 100 or 6400, and those times are rare. I've noticed considerably
>>>>>> improvement in dynamic range over the K10D, but I was still surprised
>>>>>> to see sky tones in this shot. In fact, I cropped it to leave a touch
>>>>>> of blue at the top, although the part of the sky in frame was
>>>>>> primarily white cloud. Thought it would be a complete burnout. There
>>>>>> is a bit of flash fill here, which helps by boosting the foreground.
>>>>>> But it's minimal as the shot is at 135mm, and the subject is quite
>>>>>> distant. f3.2, 1/1250, ISO 200.
>>>>>> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=7434474
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>>>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
>>>>>>             
>> follow 
>>     
>>>>>>       
>>>>>>         
>>>>>>             
>>>>> the directions.
>>>>>     
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>>>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
>>>>>           
>> follow 
>>     
>>>>> the directions.
>>>>>     
>>>>>       
>>>>>           
>>>>   
>>>>     
>>>>         
>>>   
>>>       
>> -- 
>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> [email protected]
>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
>> follow 
>> the directions.
>>     
>
>
>   

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to