>> By the way, we all need to get over to photographyreview.com and post some >> reviews of Pentax lenses. There are very few reviews posted, in the "35mm >> Primes" section, anyway. > >For quality I dont see any difference in Sigma and PENTAX lenses, I am >perhaps >mistaken, but I do see a difference in price. >I just priced a 70-200mm 2.8 constant AF lense and Sigma came in just under >$2000.00 AUD while the PENTAX equivalent came in just of $5000.00 AUD > >Even if the PENTAX lens is better, is it $3000.00 better? > >Kevin
I paid about US$750-odd for the Sigma 70-200 2.8 at B and H in NYC. Well, my friend Margot did, before she visited us :-) Cheapest I've seen here in UK is about �599, although �699 is more usual. I wish I could afford the Pentax, sure. The Sigma's pretty dern good though. Cotty _______________________________________________________ Personal email traffic to [EMAIL PROTECTED] MacAds traffic to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Check out the UK Macintosh ads http://www.macads.co.uk - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
