William Robb wrote:
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Mark Roberts"
> Subject: Re: Slightly OT: Ethical use of photos, horse show venues
> 
> 
>> Sandy Harris wrote:
>>> Unless it is "work for hire", the photographer owns the copyright.
>>>
>>> However, before acting to enforce that, I'd have a look at the contracts
>>> involved and Canadian law.
>>>
>>> It seems clear you win on the copyright issue, but if it comes to court
>>> or even if you just make her mad, she might be able to hassle you on
>>> questions of model release.
>> Not a chance as long as Dave's just showing them on his web site, rather
>> than using them for stock sales or other commercial use.
> 
> I suppose one could argue that publishing on a website is a commercial use, 
> even if it is a 
> personal website.
> Think of this: I publish portraits on my personal website, and then send 
> potential portrait 
> customers to it so they can see what I do.
> Now, have I just commercialized my website by doing this?

Nope. Well established in case law.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to