The last sentence should have read, "but the 70-200 is unlikely to ever have the flair resistance of the 70-210."
But you probably knew that... P. J. Alling wrote: > By all accounts no. The F 70-200mm f4.0~5.6 is a non multi coated > bargain lens that is cosmetically similar to the 70-210, but is more > closely related to the takumar bayonet 70-200 f4.0~5.6. There's a some > sample variation so a very good 70-200 may be better than a not so good > 70-210, but the 70-210 is unlikely to ever have the flair resistance of > the 70-210. > > Jens Bladt wrote: > >> A friend of mine - Peter - is also (as with the priviously mentione SMC >> Pentax-A 3.5 15mm) selling his F 4-5.6 70-200mm. >> >> Is this one by any chance as good as my old, trusted (and qiute reputable) >> SMC Pentax-F 4-5.6 70-210mm? >> >> I'm sure some of you know :-) >> >> Jens Bladt >> >> Hjemmeside: http://www.jensbladt.dk >> Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Fastnet: +45 55 38 54 14 >> Mobil: +45 23 43 85 77 >> Skype: Bladtfamily1 >> >> >> -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- >> Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af Bong >> Manayon >> Sendt: 3. juli 2008 12:30 >> Til: Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> Emne: Re: A different kind of photographing - at least for me >> >> >> No virus found in this outgoing message. >> Checked by AVG. >> Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 270.4.5/1533 - Release Date: 07/03/2008 >> 19:19 >> >> >> >> > > > -- Vote for Cthulhu. Why settle for a lesser evil... -- Dr. Jerry Pournelle -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
