If you shoot RAW, the K200D is slower than the EOS 1000D and has a smaller buffer. If you shoot JPEG, the K200D is only faster for the first 4 shots, then it's far slower because you just ran out of buffer and the Canon's buffer is unlimited in JPEG.
The Canon is less crippled. I'd rather have a slow framerate than a 4 shot buffer. -Adam On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 12:22 PM, Thibouille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sure, sure, but 1fps, buffer or not I don't care. I don't think thre's > even anything approaching a buffer on an eos1000D. > Personnaly (but it heavily depends on the camera use of someone) I > still "prefer" the K200D in this regard although I should say it is a > bit less cripled than eos1000D. > > -- > Thibault Massart aka Thibouille > ---------------------- > Photo: K10D,Z1,SuperA,KX,MX, P30t and KR-10x ;) ... > Thinkpad: X23+UB,X60+UB > Programing: D7 user (trying out D2007) > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. > -- M. Adam Maas http://www.mawz.ca Explorations of the City Around Us. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
