Subash,

I'm ambivalent about this pic.  Compositionally, it's an intriguing angle on a 
very lifelike statue; but was the utility pole included intentionally or was it 
unavoidable?  It both adds some interest and distracts.  Technically, a bit 
more light on the statue would be helpful, such as by using the "fill light" 
slider in Lightroom.

Rick

http://photo.net/photos/RickW


--- On Sun, 7/13/08, SJ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> hi,
> 
> another picture for your comment and critique...
> 
> a bit of a background first. :-) we have a flickr-based
> group in our
> city that meets once a month (on the second sunday) in a
> part of the
> city which is of historical/architectural importance. we
> walk around
> the locale for anything around 2-3 hours. the typical
> turnout is
> usually around 20-30 people. plenty of nikons and canons. i
> am the only
> person shooting pentax... :-)
> 
> today, we decided to go to a hill on which st. thomas was
> supposed have
> become a martyr in 73 A.D. the portuguese built a chapel
> there in 1523
> (Blessed Sacred Adoration Chapel) which is still being used
> today. in
> front of the chapel is a statue of mother teresa. it's
> a bit on the
> darkish side, but, the sun was just rising:
> 
> http://picasaweb.google.com/pdml.live/PESO/photo#5222366423270635282
> 
> K10D, FA50/1.4, 1/800s, ISO 125, f 1.8, Digikam/Linux.
> 
> look forward to your comments and suggestions.
> 
> regards, subash
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link
> directly above and follow the directions.


      

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to