I thought purple fringing - understood as Chromatic Aberration is a lens
issue - caused by the fact, that different coloured light act differently
when passing through glas:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chromatic_aberration

Regards
Jens


> I thought purple fringing was a sensor, not lens issue. ???
>
> JC OCONNELL
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> William Robb
> Sent: Sunday, July 13, 2008 2:04 PM
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: Re: DA 55-300 LBA
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Toine"
> Subject: DA 55-300 LBA
>
>
>> After a small price drop I couldn't resist the new 55-300 any longer.
>> A very nice lens. Lots of plastic fantastic but it feels well build.
>> The lens doesn't creep like the 80-320. The 16-45 feels cheaper. Image
>> quality is very good. Corner sharpness could improve a little. The MTF
>> program line wants 5.6 @ 55mm [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL 
>> PROTECTED] and
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] The results at these apertures are excellent and most
>> suprising 300 mm is very good at f8 even at 1.2 mm, it doubles as a
>> nice macro lens. Didn't try wide open. Sometimes a little CA and if
>> visible repairable in lightroom. Purple fringing is allmost non
>> existing. The 16-45 has much more CA and purple fringing problems.
>> It comes with a nice hood and pouch.
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
> follow the directions.
>



-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to