Op Tue, 22 Jul 2008 22:20:12 +0200 schreef Adam Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 4:00 PM, Lucas Rijnders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: >> Op Mon, 21 Jul 2008 17:03:28 +0200 schreef Scott Loveless >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> >>> Adam Maas wrote: >>>> http://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/667236 >>>> >>>> Looks like Cotty's got a Taiwanese imitator. >>>> >>> Is anyone else starting to wonder why Pentax isn't making Ltd lenses in >>> other mounts? >> >> Tokina suspiciously has a 35/2.8 macro, all of a sudden... >> > > That's the only one of the Limited lenses which has shown up in other > forms. And the Tokina versions of various Pentax lenses are generally Yes. And it most probably misses part of what makes a lens limited: built quality. Or is the Tokina lens body as good as the Pentax? > considered to be inferior to the Pentax (the 16-50 in particular, the > Tokina has a serious flare issue that isn't duplicated on the Pentax). Interesting. Especially in the beginning of the Tokina-Pentax coöperation, there was a lot of speculation (often stated as fact) that the Tokina's would have SMC. Apparently not (?). -- Ciao, Lucas -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
