Hi John Would that be the FA 28-105/4-5.6 Power zoom? I've yet to try it on digital.
Regards, John ________________________________________ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 23 July 2008 22:25 To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: DA* 16-50 f2.8 hood cap missing? On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 01:36:14PM -0700, Bob Blakely wrote: > > The DA* 16-50 is my walking around lens. I love this it, but I do wish it > was lighter. > > Regards, > Bob... My lightweight outfit is the *ist-D with the kit 18-55. The 16-50 has been on the K10D just about all the time. But as that also has the grip (with a second battery) I don't find the weight too much of a problem. In any case, it's a whole lot lighter than the FA* 80-200 :-) Mind you, I might have to carry the 16-50 more often. I happened to take a couple of near-identical shots, one with the 16-50, and one with the old FA 28-105. It was very noticeable that the 16-50 is *much* better than the 28-105 (both lenses at 50mm, f5.6, so that's not really too much of a surprise). -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
