On Wed, 5 Dec 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > In a message dated 12/5/01 1:32:38 PM Eastern Standard Time, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > Agreed. That's why I'm continuing this on-list instead of taking it > > off-list as I usually do. Whether from ignorance or maliciousness, Mafud > > is spreading a lot of false information about the digital process. I > > don't want people to read that and become misinformed themselves. > > > > chris > > Ah, and now the Prime Minister speaketh. > Mafud
Dang... I wanted to be the President this time. :) Mafud, if you can't argue against any of the flaws that Aaron or I point out in your statements, why do you continue to make outlandish claims and spread false information about everything digital? You did it last year, you're doing it again, and I suspect you'll still be doing it next year. What gives? And, while you're at it, what lab do you use that charges so much more for prints from digital media than from film, and what are their prices? Or did you just make up that claim out of nowhere, as I suspect you did? chris - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
