One difference between Photozone's and Mike Johnstons assessments that might be significant is that they have tried it on different cameras.
Jostein 2008/8/22 Thibouille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Well the optical blue print is the same design indeed. > But looking at the Tokina somehow I find it VERY ugly and huge. Pentax > did a nice design effort on this one :) > > I dunno why I appreciated Photozone tests but I'm more and more > convinced that such short tests are mostly irrelevant. > They point a couple issues which may be of interest. For the rest ... > try the lens. > > Just to put thinghs into perspective, compare the photozone test with > the test report from a couple days ago... > * The theory test says it is good but nothing else. > * The practical test and used by guys indeed taking pictures on the > field say it is not far from excellent (if not better). > > It is clear enough, to me. > > -- > Thibault Massart aka Thibouille > ---------------------- > Photo: K10D,Z1,SuperA,KX,MX, P30t and KR-10x ;) ... > Thinkpad: X23+UB,X60+UB > Programing: D7 user (trying out D2007) > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. > -- http://www.alunfoto.no/galleri/ http://alunfoto.blogspot.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
