They look decently sharp at 500. Dave
On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 4:23 PM, wendy beard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This was at 500 > http://www.pbase.com/wendybeard/image/78134339 > and this > http://www.pbase.com/wendybeard/image/78480271 > > This wasn't but maybe it should have been > http://www.pbase.com/wendybeard/image/84578838 > > Wendy > > On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 11:08 AM, John Sessoms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> I'm wondering how good it is at the 500 end. I do usually carry a >> tripod, and I'm finding the 300 f/2.8 isn't always long enough even with >> the converter. >> >> I like to take close-ups of things I don't really want to get that close to. >> > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. > -- Equine Photography www.caughtinmotion.com http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/ Ontario Canada -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
