I'd agree with Dave here. Nice bird shot, Wendy. Cheers, Christine
----- Original Message ----- From: "David J Brooks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2008 4:44 PM Subject: Re: Sigma 50-500 f/4-f/6.3 > They look decently sharp at 500. > > Dave > > On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 4:23 PM, wendy beard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> This was at 500 >> http://www.pbase.com/wendybeard/image/78134339 >> and this >> http://www.pbase.com/wendybeard/image/78480271 >> >> This wasn't but maybe it should have been >> http://www.pbase.com/wendybeard/image/84578838 >> >> Wendy >> >> On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 11:08 AM, John Sessoms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >>> >>> I'm wondering how good it is at the 500 end. I do usually carry a >>> tripod, and I'm finding the 300 f/2.8 isn't always long enough even with >>> the converter. >>> >>> I like to take close-ups of things I don't really want to get that close >>> to. >>> >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> [email protected] >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >> follow the directions. >> > > > > -- > Equine Photography > www.caughtinmotion.com > http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/ > Ontario Canada > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
