I had an M 85/2 and sold it. But I was quite satisfied with its performance while I owned it. It's a lot of lens for the money. I eventually found a great deal on a K 85/1.8, so the M was redundant. But it served me well. Paul On Sep 4, 2008, at 11:33 PM, Bob Sullivan wrote:
> Charles, > I've had the lens for 25 years and love it. > It was fast enough to use indoors with film. > That's not such a big point now with digital speeds, > but the f2.0 always helped me. I got better focus! > Some pdml'ers are not so wild about it, but it's a great portrait > lens. > If you watch ebay for a couple of weeks, I'd bet you could have one > for $100-$160. > That's lots cheaper than the DA70mm and it's full frame. > And it's not much bigger than the A 50mm f1.4. > Regards, Bob S. > > On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 5:18 PM, Charles Robinson > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Sep 4, 2008, at 17:10, Bob Sullivan wrote: >> >>> M 85mm f2 lens might work for you... Regards, Bob S. >>> >> >> Oh yeah? >> >> Drop me a line in email and let's talk. :-) >> >> -Charles >> >> -- >> Charles Robinson - [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Minneapolis, MN >> http://charles.robinsontwins.org >> >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> [email protected] >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above >> and follow the directions. >> > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above > and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
