I agree with Paul here. photo.net is affordable as well: $20 something a year, if I remember correctly. I use photo.net too. Some folks, however, dislike the advertising banners, but they don't bother me that much. If I was a full-time professional photographer, I'd probably do my own web site and seek out web hosting etc, but for posting PESOs & GESOs, sharing with friends & family, photo.net works fine for me. Cheers, Christine
----- Original Message ----- From: "Paul Stenquist" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2008 4:47 PM Subject: Re: Photo Hosting > I'm very happy with photo.net. I have close to 1000 photos posted > there, and the site is constantly being upgraded. It now allows easy > batch uploading and reordering of photos, among other nice features. > I like it. > Paul > On Sep 10, 2008, at 12:36 PM, John Sessoms wrote: > >> Would anyone care to discuss the pros & cons of various hosting sites? >> >> Photo.net v. flikr v. photobucket v. ??? ... >> >> I don't have anywhere on-line yet to share photos, and could use some >> advice/info regarding various hosting sites. >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> [email protected] >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above >> and follow the directions. > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
