If you want control over your camera the K-m makes it much more difficult. Two things the K200D has that the K-m Lacks, (that I noticed right off the bat), DOF preview and Green button modes. The K-m doesn't seem to support legacy K or M lenses and may not even allow m42 lenses, (unless they can be used wide open, which puts it back where the *ist-D began. Yes, I know the target market probably won't care. But bargain hunters will have to get the K200 to buy "cheap" lens capability, as will those of us who appreciate "classic" lenses. The K100/200 both have hyper manual, (as do the *ist-Dx models), disguised as the AF button kludge to use K class lenses, I would guess that's disappeared on the K-m as well. Still it looks like a perfectly good entry level camera with room to grow. Just not as much room as the K200 gives.
Brian Walters wrote: > On Mon, 22 Sep 2008 09:06:56 +0200, "Thibouille" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > said: > > >> Pentax K-m + previews >> http://www.dpreview.com/news/0809/08092206pentaxkm.asp >> > > > > > It seems like a perfectly nice entry level camera. > > I'm not sure where this leaves the K200D - doesn't seem to be much > reason to buy it over the K-m, unless you need the sealing. > > > > > > Cheers > > Brian > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > Brian Walters > Western Sydney Australia > http://members.westnet.com.au/brianwal/SL/ > -- You get further with a kind word and a gun, than with a kind word alone. --Al Capone. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
