Argh, slightly sarcastic is too subtle for me to recognize. You got me here, sir William ;-).
But I am glad that you understood me exactly right and that you seem to be in agreement with most of my argument. On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 5:17 PM, William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I was being slightly sarcastic. > I've been pretty unsure of what to replace my cameras with when they expire > for several years now, although so far, new bodies arrive and get used. > If it makes you feel any better, my D300 user friend is already complaining > about the AF in his shiny new toy, and the 6 frame RAW buffer and the > somewhat slow write speeds (to be fair, he could buy a faster card than a > 133x, I expect). > Your point is a good one, Pentax has, for all intents, a 2 camera line, the > choices being do you buy the cheap one (which the K200 fails miserably at) > or the somewhat less cheap one. > There should be a kind of expensive one somewhere in the line up with > enhanced performance. I think you are correct and this would draw more > buyers to the mid level camera. > It's probably time to let the SAFOX VIII AF retire. It was introduced in the > ist film body, and while it has had some tweaks over the years, it needs to > be improved. -- Boris -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
