Frantisek wrote: > As Mike (or somebody else?) put it, it's all about quality > standards... 9x12cm was considered "too small for anything" > photography, then 6x6, then 35mm... now we have digital. As film > offers me unparalleled versatility (so far unparalleled by > digital _in one package_) - from slow speed film with super low grain and > super > resolution (technical pan and similar) to 6400 iso, digital is > still a bit specialized tool for me. As I like to print big and > with detail (B&W condenser printing, 6x9cm,...) and _love_ large > format contact printing, all is just a tool for me. For some > people, that tool will suffice, others use 30x40cm cameras... it > all depends. > > I think a _personal view_ of the prints under > conditions ones exhibits or views his own prints is > _indispensable_ for reviewing quality of any format. It's all > about one's standards.
Well said. I agree. --Mike - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
