I prefer the Intel approach, "4/3 II". This thread is such a delightful mix of semantics, optics, and sarcasm. Reminds me of why I subscribe to the PDML.
>>> "Dario Bonazza" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 10/21/2008 3:23 PM >>> Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: > On Oct 21, 2008, at 7:02 AM, Mark Roberts wrote: > >> I wouldn't be surprised to see larger sensor 4/3 cameras appear >> after the micro 4/3 gets established. > > If it is a larger sensor, it isn't 4/3 System. By definition. That's great news. We'll call it the Super 4/3. The Olympus MktDept. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. !SIG:48fe2ca5272011234610606! -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
