I wouldn't call the Nikon 13mm a piece of junk :-) Seriously, though, I knew many people who owned and used the Sigma (mostly in Canon mount). It seemed to produce reasonable results.
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 09:27:56AM -0700, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: > Ok, three. One SLR lens, one RF lens, and a piece of junk. > > Big deal. ]'-) > > G > > On Oct 21, 2008, at 7:03 AM, Adam Maas wrote: > >> Nikon 13mm f5.6, Voigtlander 12mm f5.6, Sigma 12-24mm f4.5-5.6 >> >> -Adam >> >> On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 9:51 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >>> Olympus has a lovely 7-14mm lens in 4/3 System which nets 115 >>> diagonal >>> degrees,rectilinear. There's only one lens I know of for so-called >>> "full >>> frame" that provides a wider rectilinear FoV. >>> >>> Godfrey - www.gdgphoto.com >>> >>> On Oct 21, 2008, at 4:50 AM, Steve Desjardins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> The only real issue (in my mind) is the availability of wide angle >>>> lenses. It's easier to get wide angles for the FX format >>>> (Nikonese, I >>>> believe) especially since so many exist in the used market. Other >>>> than >>>> that, I'm happy with a smaller camera and the DX format. >>>> > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
