Hi, Just out of curiosity, why do you think (if you find it lacking) MZ-S lacks a bottom (far-right when vertical) AF point? For me, it would make AFing portraits pretty difficult, as we (the part of PDML using Latin alphabet or writing in left>right direction) tend to read photos from left to right, so an "optimized" portrait placing is looking to the left, on right side of frame (if I can exaggerate it somehow).
I am just curious if this missing AF point is beacuse of Japanese "reverse" right>left reading direction. Our reading direction has a definite impact on reading photographs, and their has probably too. Good light, (bored) Frantisek Vlcek - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
