At first I didn't thin that this missing AF point was bit deal, but having used the camera a bit, there have been times when I wished it was there.
I don' tthink it has anything to do with the Latin vs Nippon alphabet. My guess is that it has to do with how the active AF sensor is displayed in the MZ-S finder. - MCC At 11:51 AM 12/10/01 +0100, you wrote: >Hi, > Just out of curiosity, why do you think (if you find it lacking) > MZ-S lacks a bottom (far-right when vertical) AF point? For me, it > would make AFing portraits pretty difficult, as we (the part of > PDML using Latin alphabet or writing in left>right direction) tend > to read photos from left to right, so an "optimized" portrait > placing is looking to the left, on right side of frame (if I can > exaggerate it somehow). > > I am just curious if this missing AF point is beacuse of Japanese > "reverse" right>left reading direction. Our reading direction has a > definite impact on reading photographs, and their has probably too. > > >Good light, >(bored) Frantisek Vlcek >- >This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, >go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to >visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - - - - - - - - - - Mark Cassino Kalamazoo, MI [EMAIL PROTECTED] - - - - - - - - - - Photos: http://www.markcassino.com - - - - - - - - - - - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
