There are 2 schools of thought on that Tom. I like the 2 equal body version
myself. However I don't have that. Some pros I know have the top body as
their primary and the next one down as a secondary. Sometimes what comes
into play is the fact you might not want to walk around in some locales with
your most expensive body. Or you might want one slightly cheaper for other
reasons. Or you want your second body to be good but lighter. (F5 and F100.
EOS-1v and EOS-3, Maxxum 9 and Maxxum 7).
Kent Gittings

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tom Rittenhouse
Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 9:36 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Second Camera Body Recommendations


Not a direct responce to you, ED, but a question that always comes up in my
mind when people start asking about second bodies. On this list and amongst
a most of the hobbiests I know, they always want a different body than the
one they have. Myself and most pros I have known, on the other hand, want
two identical bodies so we don't have to think about which one we are using
at the moment. I wonder why that is?

Ciao,
graywolf



----- Original Message -----
From: EWKPhoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Pentax-Discuss@Pdml. Net <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 9:45 PM
Subject: Second Camera Body Recommendations


> I currently own a Pentax PZ20 that I have been using for quite sometime.
I
> am beginning to shoot slide film, but would like to continue to shoot
prints
> as well. My wife also uses the camera to shoot when she is in the mood
> (mainly family prints).
>
> I am looking to get a second body to alleviate the slide/print problem (as
> well as the ability to have one camera per person).  I'll probably look to
> the used market for something that will handle my current lens set as well
> as offer the same or better functionality of the PZ20.  I might also go to
a
> new camera if the recommendation is for something in the ZX-30 range ($199
> less $40 rebate at B&H).
>
> Lenses:
>   SMC-FA f/3.5-4.7 28-80
>   SMC-FA f/3.5-5.6 28-80
>   SMC-FA f/4-5.6 70-200
>   SMC-FA f/4.5-5.6 100-300
>
> Looking for recommendations.
>
> Thanks...
> Ed
> -
> This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
> go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
> visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .



**********************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager.

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.

www.mimesweeper.com
**********************************************************************
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .

Reply via email to