On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 5:57 PM, Christine  Aguila
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Adam Maas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <[email protected]>
> Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2008 4:13 PM
> Subject: Re: Wide zoom (and not zoom) lenses redux
>
>
>> On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 4:46 PM, Christine  Aguila
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>> I'd just like to agree with Jack on DA 16-45;
>>>
>>>
>>> Boris wrote:  >> No matter how strange this sounds, but it seems that
>>> there
>>>>>
>>>>> is no decidedly good lens in 16(17,18)-45(50, 70) range for
>>>>> modern Pentax DSLR. Each lens has some serious drawbacks.
>>>
>>> Boris:  I don't mean to nit-pick here, and maybe I'm just reading your
>>> post
>>> wrong, but you seem to assess "any" drawback as a "serious" drawback.
>>> You'd
>>> agree, wouldn't you, that some drawbacks are more serious than others? If
>>> so, it seems to me the DA 16-45 would fair fairly well in lens
>>> assessment.
>>> Maybe I'm reading your post wrong.  If so, just ignore.  :-)  Cheers,
>>> Christine
>>>
>>>
>>
>> I'd have to agree. I've owned the 16-45 when I had my K100D and found
>> it to be excellent overall. The only reasons I didn't buy another one
>> when I bought back into Pentax in 2007 was the fact the Sigma 17-70
>> was a full stop faster at the wide end and significantly (about 20%)
>> cheaper at the time.
>
> I agree with you too, Adam. :-) Yes, 2.8 would be great, but now that I have
> a K20D with the really good high ISO, I feel more confident shooting indoors
> with this lens.
>

I shoot a lot of low-light cityscapes so speed was a huge issue for
me, still is (and is why I eventually sold my K10D) Now I've got a
D300 with the 16-85VR and some really fast primes (35/1.4, 58/1.4)

-- 
M. Adam Maas
http://www.mawz.ca
Explorations of the City Around Us.

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to