Bob W. You need a cause or something to crusade for...maybe global warming? This problem with Photo.net advertising seems to petty to merit your attention. Regards, Bob S.
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 2:47 AM, Bob W <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Okay. But my real point was that none of the photo sites are >> perfect. > [...] >> i just didn't like the recommendation that >> PDML members refrain from posting on photo.net. I've been >> there for a >> long time, and I intend to stay there. >> Paul > > I wasn't complaining about advertising as such, I was complaining about the > particularly annoying type of advertising that photo.net is showing at the > moment. > > I dislike advertising intensely at the best of times. More often than not > it's visual pollution and thinly disguised lying, but I'm enough of a > realist to know it's not going away, and advertising per se won't > necessarily drive me away from a site. However I don't have to put up with > annoying animations winking in the corner of my eye. > >> The fact that a site is able >> to attract advertising is an indication of its success, not its failure. > > That may be so, but when the advertising starts to drive people away, who > wins? > > Bob > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
