HAR!
On Nov 26, 2008, at 3:13 PM, Bob W wrote:
I have a cause - to rid the world of advertising. I'm putting double-
page
spreads in all the national dailies tomorrow, and having a poster
campaign
to announce it to the world and ask people to rally to the cause.
Bob
Bob W.
You need a cause or something to crusade for...maybe global warming?
This problem with Photo.net advertising seems to petty to
merit your attention.
Regards, Bob S.
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 2:47 AM, Bob W <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Okay. But my real point was that none of the photo sites are
perfect.
[...]
i just didn't like the recommendation that
PDML members refrain from posting on photo.net. I've been
there for a
long time, and I intend to stay there.
Paul
I wasn't complaining about advertising as such, I was
complaining about the
particularly annoying type of advertising that photo.net is
showing at the
moment.
I dislike advertising intensely at the best of times. More
often than not
it's visual pollution and thinly disguised lying, but I'm
enough of a
realist to know it's not going away, and advertising per se won't
necessarily drive me away from a site. However I don't have
to put up with
annoying animations winking in the corner of my eye.
The fact that a site is able
to attract advertising is an indication of its success,
not its failure.
That may be so, but when the advertising starts to drive
people away, who
wins?
Bob
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above
and follow the directions.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
