You're wrong John, it was done under false pretenses. McCain went there
for a cover photograph, an honest image of his physical appearance. If
he had know the use his image would have been put to he would never have
agreed. This is a form of contract. A lack of agreement means no
contract is in force. The magazine was blindsided, and so was McCain.
If he didn't fall under the category of celebrity he would have a good
case for slander
John Sessoms wrote:
Greenberg didn't hog-tie McCain and force him to pose. He agreed to do
it, and the image submitted for the magazine cover is conventionally
flattering. Whether Greenberg is a McCain supporter or not is immaterial.
There's quite a few famous photographers shooting fluff & puff
celebrity portraits whose work doesn't impress me AT ALL. Pre-paid
paparazzi working from inside the publicity apparatus is all they are;
no better than the window peepers they look down on.
There's not even enough for a tempest in a teapot there as far as I'm
concerned.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
follow the directions.
--
You get further with a kind word and a gun, than with a kind word alone.
--Al Capone.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
