do you have any technical papers or links explaining what is chemically different about these "eneloops" even though they are still considered nimh? Im not saying your wrong, it just doesnt make sense to call them nimh if they have different or additional chemistry to me...
JC O'Connell [email protected] -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Charles Robinson Sent: Monday, December 22, 2008 5:10 PM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: rechargeable batteries - any wisdom? On Dec 22, 2008, at 11:38, JC OConnell wrote: > nimh technology is nimh technolgy, I havent > read anything anwhere that there are different/special characteristics > for any of these cells... > Well, good morning and time to start reading the news again. Eneloops are very different from "standard" NiMH. -Charles -- Charles Robinson - [email protected] Minneapolis, MN http://charles.robinsontwins.org -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
