On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 8:44 PM, Scott Loveless <[email protected]> wrote: > On 12/22/08, Bruce Dayton <[email protected]> wrote: >> I never felt like that brand name was all that special. My >> experience over the years was that they did well with instant films, >> but the image quality was always mediocre at best. It had a use, but >> a quality brand name it was not. > > I like Karen Nakamura's definition. "A company with great products > but absolutely horrendous marketing. The opposite of Microsoft > Corporation." > > -- > Scott Loveless
Frankly, try some Fuji FP100C and experience what Polaroid's colour films could have been. Polaroid had a few great products (Type 55 comes to mind) but has been more marketting than product for pretty much my entire lifetime. -- M. Adam Maas http://www.mawz.ca Explorations of the City Around Us. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
