On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 8:15 PM, Bruce Dayton <[email protected]> wrote: > I never felt like that brand name was all that special. My > experience over the years was that they did well with instant films, > but the image quality was always mediocre at best. It had a use, but > a quality brand name it was not.
I had one of the instant cameras for a number of years. I would take photos of dent's, dings and other flaws in our pipeline maintenance work, for ours and TransCanada's references. When i bought the Kodak DC25 digital in 1997 i could no by pass the slow process of mailing in the photos and just email them, with changes and captions. They loved it, and that sold me on digital.:-0 Dave > > -- > Best regards, > Bruce > > > Monday, December 22, 2008, 4:18:35 PM, you wrote: > > AM> Not exactly news I'm afraid, they basicly stopped doing business about > AM> 6-8 months ago and announced the end of all of their real product > AM> lines. I guess the transition from manufacturer to mere brand failed > AM> (as expected) > > AM> -Adam > > AM> On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 4:29 PM, William Robb <[email protected]> wrote: >>> This time it's Polaroid. >>> >>> http://www.imaginginfo.com/web/online/News/Polaroid-in-Bankruptcy/3$4589 >>> >>> >>> William Robb >>> >>> -- >>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>> [email protected] >>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >>> follow the directions. >>> > > > > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. > -- Equine Photography www.caughtinmotion.com http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/ Ontario Canada -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
