I don't know why companies keep trying that. It almost never works. Then someone else buys the brand after they fail and slaps it on cheap junk, kind of what Poloroid did to themselves...
-----Original Message----- >From: Adam Maas <[email protected]> >Sent: Dec 22, 2008 7:18 PM >To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> >Subject: Re: Another Casualty. > >Not exactly news I'm afraid, they basicly stopped doing business about >6-8 months ago and announced the end of all of their real product >lines. I guess the transition from manufacturer to mere brand failed >(as expected) > >-Adam > >On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 4:29 PM, William Robb <[email protected]> wrote: >> This time it's Polaroid. >> >> http://www.imaginginfo.com/web/online/News/Polaroid-in-Bankruptcy/3$4589 >> >> >> William Robb >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> [email protected] >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >> follow the directions. >> > > > >-- >M. Adam Maas >http://www.mawz.ca >Explorations of the City Around Us. > >-- >PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >[email protected] >http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow >the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
