Guess, I will not be able to get any more film for my Polaroid back for my LX.. I will take a photo of it, so the list members can see what it looks like, if any of you did not that there was made for the LX. It was made the same time when the Nikon F3 version was also out. But however I still have frozen Polaroid film number's 667 and 669 in the fridge. Joe
-------------- Original message ---------------------- From: "Steve Desjardins" <[email protected]> > Adorama has a really good price on a Polaroid camera. > > http://www.adorama.com/PDONE6U.html?emailprice=t > > May want to drop it a bit more ;-) > > >>> <[email protected]> 12/26/2008 2:42 PM >>> > > > ---- Anthony Farr <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > There was also the pre-Powerpoint blueprint film, whose name I > forget. > > > > > > > That'll be dyeline paper, a diazo process. Ilfochrome / Cibachrome > also > > used azo dyes, which are dyes that whose chemical bonds somehow break > down > > when exposed to strong or UV light, leaving the unexposed part to be > > developed to an autopositive image (same ultimate result as reversal > but a > > different chemical process). Dyeline paper is developed in ammonia > fumes. > > If you handle any freshly developed dyeline paper you MUST NOT handle > any > > other film or photographic paper until you've thoroughly washed your > hands, > > because ammonia will completely fog them, whether they're exposed or > not. > > > > regards, Anthony > > Sorry, not being clear. There was a Polaroid 35mm film that output > similar images to cyanotpye. White image on a blue background. It was > used to produce slides of writing for use in AV presentations. It was > terrifyingly expensive and, before the days of TTL flash, you had to > sacrifice a film in testing to obtin correct exposure. > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On > Behalf Of > > > [email protected] > > > Sent: Wednesday, 24 December 2008 9:20 PM > > > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > > Subject: Re: Another Casualty. > > > > > > > > > ---- John Sessoms <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > From: John Francis > > > > > I believe there was also Polaroid-branded 35mm roll film. > > > > > > > > They developed and marketed a 35mm instant film that didn't do > very well > > > > in the market. IIRC, it was transparency film available in both > color > > > > and B&W versions. > > > > > > > > Later they offered Polaroid brand C-41 process 35mm film, and may > have > > > > offered an E6 35mm film as well. > > > > > > > > I'm sure about the C-41 version because I have a roll in the > freezer; > > > > not so sure about the E6. > > > > > > There was also the pre-Powerpoint blueprint film, whose name I > forget. > > All of the > > > Polaroid 35mm stuff was self (and dry) process, to give you the > quickest > > result. > > > > > > -- > > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > > [email protected] > > > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above > and > > follow > > > the directions. > > > > > > -- > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > [email protected] > > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above > and follow the directions. > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. > > !SIG:495533bb264831190184214! > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
