Thanks, Adam..Joe http://photo.net/photos/pjjdxn
-------------- Original message ---------------------- From: "Adam Maas" <[email protected]> > Check the Fuji FP100C, IIRC it's available in a compatible size (I > know it works in the Polaroid pack film holders for MF) > > -Adam > > On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 12:19 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > > Guess, I will not be able to get any more film for my Polaroid back for my > LX.. I will take a photo of it, so the list members can see what it looks > like, > if any of you did not that there was made for the LX. It was made the same > time > when the Nikon F3 version was also out. > > But however I still have frozen Polaroid film number's 667 and 669 in the > fridge. Joe > > > > -------------- Original message ---------------------- > > From: "Steve Desjardins" <[email protected]> > >> Adorama has a really good price on a Polaroid camera. > >> > >> http://www.adorama.com/PDONE6U.html?emailprice=t > >> > >> May want to drop it a bit more ;-) > >> > >> >>> <[email protected]> 12/26/2008 2:42 PM >>> > >> > >> > >> ---- Anthony Farr <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > > > >> > > There was also the pre-Powerpoint blueprint film, whose name I > >> forget. > >> > > > >> > > >> > That'll be dyeline paper, a diazo process. Ilfochrome / Cibachrome > >> also > >> > used azo dyes, which are dyes that whose chemical bonds somehow break > >> down > >> > when exposed to strong or UV light, leaving the unexposed part to be > >> > developed to an autopositive image (same ultimate result as reversal > >> but a > >> > different chemical process). Dyeline paper is developed in ammonia > >> fumes. > >> > If you handle any freshly developed dyeline paper you MUST NOT handle > >> any > >> > other film or photographic paper until you've thoroughly washed your > >> hands, > >> > because ammonia will completely fog them, whether they're exposed or > >> not. > >> > > >> > regards, Anthony > >> > >> Sorry, not being clear. There was a Polaroid 35mm film that output > >> similar images to cyanotpye. White image on a blue background. It was > >> used to produce slides of writing for use in AV presentations. It was > >> terrifyingly expensive and, before the days of TTL flash, you had to > >> sacrifice a film in testing to obtin correct exposure. > >> > >> > > >> > > -----Original Message----- > >> > > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On > >> Behalf Of > >> > > [email protected] > >> > > Sent: Wednesday, 24 December 2008 9:20 PM > >> > > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > >> > > Subject: Re: Another Casualty. > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > ---- John Sessoms <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > > > From: John Francis > >> > > > > I believe there was also Polaroid-branded 35mm roll film. > >> > > > > >> > > > They developed and marketed a 35mm instant film that didn't do > >> very well > >> > > > in the market. IIRC, it was transparency film available in both > >> color > >> > > > and B&W versions. > >> > > > > >> > > > Later they offered Polaroid brand C-41 process 35mm film, and may > >> have > >> > > > offered an E6 35mm film as well. > >> > > > > >> > > > I'm sure about the C-41 version because I have a roll in the > >> freezer; > >> > > > not so sure about the E6. > >> > > > >> > > There was also the pre-Powerpoint blueprint film, whose name I > >> forget. > >> > All of the > >> > > Polaroid 35mm stuff was self (and dry) process, to give you the > >> quickest > >> > result. > >> > > > >> > > -- > >> > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > >> > > [email protected] > >> > > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > >> > > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above > >> and > >> > follow > >> > > the directions. > >> > > >> > > >> > -- > >> > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > >> > [email protected] > >> > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > >> > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above > >> and follow the directions. > >> > >> > >> -- > >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > >> [email protected] > >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > >> follow the directions. > >> > >> !SIG:495533bb264831190184214! > >> > >> > >> -- > >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > >> [email protected] > >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > >> follow > >> the directions. > > > > > > -- > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > [email protected] > > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > > follow > the directions. > > > > > > -- > M. Adam Maas > http://www.mawz.ca > Explorations of the City Around Us. > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
