I'd be using a prime if somebody made a 10mm Rectilinear lens for DX
(As it is my only option would be the Nikkor 10.5mm Fisheye and
defishing automatically in CaptureNX, but thta costs me edge
resolution compared to the 10-20).

-Adam

On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 7:24 AM, Luiz Felipe <[email protected]> wrote:
> First of all - big thanks to you all! I believe nothing beats knowledgeable 
> hands-on experience (I hope you get the meaning) when it comes to choose 
> gear. Thank you - and anyone still typing or thinking about, I hope this 
> discussion is not finished for a while.
>
> I'd rather use primes - but then again, carrying loads of lenses raises hell 
> with shoulders, backs and bank accounts, so I'm probably using one such zoom, 
> 50mm and old 28~70 (no tele, low light and weight), or either add 135mm or 
> switch the 28~70 for a 28~200 from Tamron I find rather acceptable. Still the 
> ghosts of 14, 21, 77 or 85 haunt me. Since I can't buy them all... let's zoom 
> for now.
>
> What set on this lens besides the extra wide capability was the report on 
> lower CAS on the photozone reports, specially compared to Pentax designs. I 
> also got the idea that its distortion would be less a problem than with a 18~ 
> or 17~, assuming the use at 17 or 18mm.
>
> Thinking and reading about - and will post any development. Did I say 
> thanks??? :-)
>
> Luiz Felipe
> luiz.felipe at techmit.com.br
>
>
>
>
> Mon, 29 Dec 2008 10:55:13 +0000, John Whittingham <[email protected]> 
> escreveu:
>
>> I've had one for a couple of years, works very well with the K10D and K20D - 
>> I love it! It has very little distortion except at the very edge of the 
>> frame at 10mm, good balance of abberations, very sharp.
>>
>> Regards, John.
>> ________________________________________
>> From: [email protected] [[email protected]] On Behalf Of Luiz Felipe 
>> [[email protected]]
>> Sent: 28 December 2008 16:36
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: sigma 10~20 dc ex  - hands-on comments?
>>
>> Been browsing extrawide options for digital cameras, I found different 
>> photozone results between Nikon and Pentax versions. Since my current lenses 
>> will cover the normal-tele range with my future k200 or k2000, I'd like to 
>> read from you guys about this lens.
>>
>> Trying to get the most out my hardly earned $, I tought about skipping the 
>> kit lens and going for the body only (k200) plus this lens. Any comments?
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Luiz Felipe
>> luiz.felipe at techmit.com.br
>>
>> --
>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> [email protected]
>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
>> follow the directions.
>>
>> --
>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> [email protected]
>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
>> follow the directions.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.
>



-- 
M. Adam Maas
http://www.mawz.ca
Explorations of the City Around Us.

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to