The exposure in #22 is not harsh (see the original image I've added),
while
the rendering I've chosen is.
I kinda figured that - you're too good a photographer not to have done it on
purpose.
Just not my cup of tea.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dario Bonazza" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: PESO = No wolves
Thanks Ken,
Since my previous reply didn't show up, I'm trying again.
By not including the lower window in #21, the 'scream' effect would be
gone.
The exposure in #22 is not harsh (see the original image I've added),
while
the rendering I've chosen is. That's intended, not an accident. Of course,
one can like the original one better.
Dario
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ken Waller" <[email protected]>
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, January 04, 2009 8:26 PM
Subject: Re: PESO = No wolves
I have some interest in the first one (The geometrical contrasts) but
think it should not include the lower window.
The second image is too harsh (exposure) for my liking.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
