Paul Stenquist wrote:
I thought in equivalent field of view when I first moved to digital. Now
after tens of thousands of digital photos, I know what the FOV of a
given lens is on my camera. The 35mm FOVs never cross my mind. My 16-50
is a 16-50. Period. At one end it's nice for landscapes and my VTs. At
the other end, it's a slightly wide portrait lens. Equivalents are for
the newbies.
Paul
I am newbie then, by your reasoning ;-). But I find it is a positive
thing, as it means that the road is still long ahead of me.
Boris
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
