On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 11:39:29PM -0500, Doug Franklin wrote: > > But my point has nothing to do with the laws or even the insurance > contract. My point is that /my/ ass is worth more to /me/ than to stand > in a place like he chose, for any reason whatsoever. I cannot fathom > his choice of shooting location, even though, on second review, it does > seem to be a bridge. Of course, I'm a paranoid cuss, too. I can all > too well imagine the physics of that corner gone bad.
I'm with Doug on this. Although I always assumed it was a pretty solid piece of the landscape (it doesn't move at all when the car hits it, and the post-impact shots of the car make it clear just how hard a hit it was) Doug makes an excellent point - there's no need to stand in an impact zone. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
