Nick, No photos online, but I've used all 3 on film. The advantage to the M85/2 is f2.0 focusing. The extra light is a real plus. The M100/2.8 is small and only a little slower. It may be sharper than the M85/2, or it may be that you are not tempted to push it as much as the f2.0. The M120/2.8 and M135/3.5 are close, but the M120/2.8 is rare and much more expensive. I'd stick with your 1st two choices. Regards, Bob S.
On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 8:04 PM, Nick Wright <[email protected]> wrote: > > I'm looking at getting a fast tele prime. I'm considering the M85/2, the > M100/2.8, and the M120/2.8. > > What are your thoughts about these lenses? Does anyone have some samples > (specifically portraits) that I could take a look at? > > Thanks. > > ~Nick David Wright > http://pedalingprose.wordpress.com/ > > > > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
