I keep seeing people say the 120/2.8 is pricey. But KEH has three copies in 
stock right now between $133 and $235. I don't consider that particularly 
pricey, are we talking about the same lens?

~Nick David Wright
http://pedalingprose.wordpress.com/


--- On Sat, 2/7/09, Peter Alling <webste...@mindspring.com> wrote:

> From: Peter Alling <webste...@mindspring.com>
> Subject: Re: short tele primes
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <pdml@pdml.net>
> Date: Saturday, February 7, 2009, 12:47 PM
> Ah, I should have read the whole thread before I posted.  I
> actually have all of the lenses in question.  The 120mm is a
> bit rare and pricy.  The 100mm is very nice, and probably
> least expensive to buy.  I used it a fair amoung on film,
> sharpest of the three at all apertures.  The 85mm is now one
> of my most used lenses but as a general purpose telephoto on
> digital, a 50mm lens fulfills it's orginal purpose much
> better on digital. One of the bigest advantages of the 85mm
> is that it's really not much bigger than a 50 f1.4, most
> people don't realize it's a telephoto when
> you're taking candids.  As others have mentioned you
> might want to look at a 135mm.  As a focal length it's
> out of vogue right now, so you may be able to pick up even
> the semi-ledgendary [K] 135mm f2.5 relitively cheaply. 
> Another alternate would be the [K] 135 f3.5.  It's not
> as compact as the M-135mm but it's supposed to be
> sharper.  It's a bit bigger without a built in lens hood
> and though relitively rare you can probably get one for the
> same price as the M in similar condition if you can find
> one.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> >From: Nick Wright <pedalingpr...@yahoo.com>
> >Sent: Feb 6, 2009 9:54 PM
> >To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <pdml@pdml.net>
> >Subject: Re: short tele primes
> >
> >
> >Hi, that's a great shot. Do you have any idea what
> aperture you shot that at?
> >
> >It's good to be back. I quit my last newspaper job
> several months back and have been taking something of a
> sabbatical concerning photography.
> >
> >I think I've finally worked out the residual stress
> from that job and am ready to start practicing photography
> for myself again. So today I placed an order for a Program
> Plus and a 50/2 from KEH. But I'm still trying to decide
> which of the teles I want to round out my kit hence the
> original question.
> >
> >Thanks for the reply.
> >
> >~Nick David Wright
> >http://pedalingprose.wordpress.com/
> >
> >
> >--- On Sat, 2/7/09, Scott Loveless
> <sdlovel...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> From: Scott Loveless <sdlovel...@gmail.com>
> >> Subject: Re: short tele primes
> >> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
> <pdml@pdml.net>
> >> Date: Saturday, February 7, 2009, 2:32 AM
> >> On 2/6/09, Nick Wright
> <pedalingpr...@yahoo.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >  I'm looking at getting a fast tele
> prime. I'm
> >> considering the M85/2, the M100/2.8, and the
> M120/2.8.
> >> >
> >> >  What are your thoughts about these lenses?
> Does
> >> anyone have some samples (specifically portraits)
> that I
> >> could take a look at?
> >> 
> >> Hi, Nick.  Good to hear from you again.  I have a
> copy of
> >> the M85/2,
> >> and I rather like it.  This is the only photo I
> have online
> >> right now
> >> that was definitely taken with this lens.
> >> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3813278
> >> 
> >> HTH.
> >> 
> >> -- 
> >> Scott Loveless
> >> Cigarette-free since December 14th, 2008
> >> http://www.twosixteen.com/fivetoedsloth/
> >> 
> >> --
> >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> >> PDML@pdml.net
> >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the
> link
> >> directly above and follow the directions.
> >
> >
> >      
> >
> >
> >--
> >PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> >PDML@pdml.net
> >http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> >to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link
> directly above and follow the directions.
> 
> 
> -- 
> I want to die peacfuly in my sleep like my grandfather, not
> screaming like the passengers in his car...
> 
> Will Shriner
> 
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link
> directly above and follow the directions.


      


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to