This header?

From:   [email protected]
Subject:        Re: ebay question
Date:   February 12, 2009 14:47:54
To:     [email protected]
Reply-To:       [email protected]

Or this header?

From:   [email protected]
        Subject:        Re: ebay question

        Date:   February 12, 2009 14:47:54

        To:     [email protected]
        Reply-To:       [email protected]
        Return-Path:    <[email protected]>

Received: from smtpin126-bge351000 ([10.150.68.126]) by ms121.mac.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-7.04 (built Sep 26 2008; 64bit)) with ESMTP id <[email protected]> for [email protected]; Thu, 12 Feb 2009 14:47:58 -0800 (PST)

Received: from server1.emwd.com ([74.52.21.50]) by smtpin126.mac.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-8.01 (built Dec 16 2008; 32bit)) with ESMTP id <[email protected]> for [email protected] (ORCPT [email protected]); Thu, 12 Feb 2009 14:47:58 -0800 (PST)

Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=server1.emwd.com) by server1.emwd.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <[email protected] >) id 1LXkLW-0001FG-3U; Thu, 12 Feb 2009 17:47:50 -0500

Received: from adsl-66-125-168-234.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net ([66.125.168.234] helo=red4est.red4est.com ident=root) by server1.emwd.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <[email protected]>) id 1LXkLT-0001F8-27 for [email protected]; Thu, 12 Feb 2009 17:47:49 -0500

Received: from red4est.red4est.com (l...@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by red4est.red4est.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id n1CMlspG028952 for <[email protected]>; Thu, 12 Feb 2009 14:47:55 -0800

Received: (from l...@localhost) by red4est.red4est.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/ Submit) id n1CMls0F028951 for [email protected]; Thu, 12 Feb 2009 14:47:54 -0800

        Original-Recipient:     rfc822;[email protected]

        X-Brightmail-Tracker:   AAAAAQAAAUA=

Domainkey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=pdml.net; h=From:Date:To:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME- Version:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To:User-Agent:X-Spam-Status:X- Spam-Score:X-Spam-Bar:X-Spam-Flag:X-BeenThere:X-Mailman- Version:Precedence:Reply-To:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List- Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:Content-Type:Content-Transfer- Encoding:Sender:Errors-To; b=nw/ AMkcduEyeqHr6APXRuOyVd2cjRwQiizyAjohMTgkEGHS2/OzZOBm +jhed5qNWeVq3yx3QgPQpkyLBNLvo/sgcr/ MLZRj0UBrueKEgQ66OXn97nwOJSt0H9hHB42FP;

        Message-Id:     <[email protected]>

References: <[email protected]> <[email protected] >

        Mime-Version:   1.0

        Content-Disposition:    inline

In-Reply-To: <[email protected] >

        User-Agent:     Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11)

        X-Spam-Status:  No, score=-0.8

        X-Spam-Score:   -7

        X-Spam-Bar:     /

        X-Spam-Flag:    NO

        X-Beenthere:    [email protected]

        X-Mailman-Version:      2.1.11.cp3

        Precedence:     list

        List-Id:        Pentax-Discuss Mail List <pdml_pdml.net.pdml.net>

List-Unsubscribe: <http://pdml.net/mailman/options/pdml_pdml.net>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe >

        List-Archive:   <http://pdml.net/pipermail/pdml_pdml.net>

        List-Post:      <mailto:[email protected]>

        List-Help:      <mailto:[email protected]?subject=help>

List-Subscribe: <http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=subscribe >

        Content-Type:   text/plain; charset=us-ascii

        Content-Transfer-Encoding:      7bit

        Sender:         [email protected]

        Errors-To:      [email protected]

X-Antiabuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report

        X-Antiabuse:    Primary Hostname - server1.emwd.com

        X-Antiabuse:    Original Domain - mac.com

        X-Antiabuse:    Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]

        X-Antiabuse:    Sender Address Domain - pdml.net

I'll assume the second header. In which case they were wrong in ansking for the header. Long headers are always required by scam hunters.

Joe

On Feb 12, 2009, at 14:47 , Larry Colen wrote:

On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 03:09:11PM -0500, Adam Maas wrote:
# On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 11:42 AM, John Sessoms <[email protected] > wrote:
# > From: Adam Maas
#
# I spent a number of years doing Network Security work. Dealt with eBay
# on a regular basis. They're death on any sort of Fraud. They care a
# lot less about disputes between buyer and seller though.

I tried sending them everything I could to help nail the scammers.

I sent them the pointer to the ebay message, with the message cut and
pasted, I also sent them the email.

They asked for headers, I attached the whole mail file with, of
course, headers, with all of the correspondence.

They sent me a note back, asking for the headers.

I sent them the headers, and the file, with explanations of how to
read a mail file to find the headers. They just repeated the same
message I had gotten several times about it not being a real second
chance offer.

I'd guess that they just reprogramed liza to answer the abuse mail,
but a program would do a better job, it could grep for the headers.


--
       It's not the steps in the dance, it's the dance in the steps.
Larry Colen             [email protected]            http://www.red4est.com/lrc


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to