I have two light meters: Sekonic L208 and Sekonic L328. I use them both.

I don't seem to have the problems that others report with the L208 suggesting underexposure but then, to me, a meter is just that: a meter. I interpret the meters' reading per what I know of the scene.

The same goes for the in-camera metering system. I spend a good bit of time and energy learning what the in-camera meter does in all its various modes and a broad variety of lighting situations, using whatever tools are needed. Including the histogram display.

And then, knowing what a meter does, I turn off all the analytic tools and just shoot without looking, when I'm working.

My primary need for a hand held meter these days is for flash setups so the L208 gets only occasional use and the L328 is used with the standard incident dome 90%+ of the time. I also use it for calibration testing of the in-camera meters.

Were I in the market for a new meter now, I'd buy the Sekonic L358 which replaced the L328 in their line. It has a larger dome and more sensitivity, a little nicer shape in the hand.

But overall, learning the particulars of an in-camera meter and using it properly is more than adequate for the VAST majority of my work. That, and guessing intelligently. ;-)

Godfrey


On Feb 25, 2009, at 7:04 PM, Nick David Wright wrote:

I personally really hate that process. Shoot, chimp, shoot, chimp. I like to just be able to shoot and know that the photo was exposed the way I wanted it.

That's one of the myriad reasons I was so anxious to switch back to Pentax, in my experience with the cameras in the past the meters were extremely reliable. And I'm finding that's still true today, even with my older Program Plus. Even in tricky situations it -- for the most part -- chooses the exposure I would've chosen. I love it.

So maybe I really don't need a separate light meter after all? That nasty old gear-headedness poking its head up again. ;)


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to