Candace, 

I'm taking the liberty of cc'ing this to the pdml mailing list that I
mentioned to you. There are people there that'll correct me if I lead
you astray with my advice. As usual I seem to have erred in the
attempt for completeness rather than brevity.

pdml,
Candace is the friend of mine that was trying to find a K2000 in
Sacramento, she gave up and ordered the white two lens kit off the
web. 

If, by some small miracle, your reply is somewhat close to the topic,
and would be of use to Candace, then remember to cc her, as she hasn't
joined the list. Though I did tell her about the Sacramento gathering
coming up.

On Thu, Mar 05, 2009 at 03:18:49PM -0800, Candace wrote:

> Question about the pancake DA 40 lens...
> 
>  
> What's the difference between the DA 40and the other small
> lenses that are
> around?  I've heard people mention the DA 21
> and the like....what are the differences that would make one
> choose one over the other?


focal length, speed, size, macro ability, image quality...

Note that with your two zooms, you'll be able to hit any of those
focal lengths. What you'll want to do is find out what focal lengths
you like to shoot at, which you can do by looking at the exif data on
your photos.

In general, I'd rather have a lens that's a little too wide because
lost resolution from cropping is easier to deal with than image that
just isn't there.

The other thing that makes a big difference is the speed of the
lens. When do you find yourself wishing that you had a faster shutter
speed? What focal length are you using?

People will choose a prime over a zoom for various reasons, they
basically boil down to:
size, speed, zoom range, cost, image quality: choose any three.

The other reason that people will choose a prime over a zoom is that
some people prefer the experience of taking pictures using a prime. 

The "standard" lens for a 35mm camera is 50mm. For decades, basically
every 35mm SLR came with a 50-60mm prime, somewhere between f/1.4 and
f/2. For your K2000 the equivalent to 50mm would be about 33mm.

This lens:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&ssPageName=STRK:MEWAX:IT&item=160319286437

The FA31/1.8 limited is considered by many to be the ultimate Pentax Lens,
and by quite a few to be one of the best lenses ever made. They list
for something ridiculous, but can normally be found for a bit under
$700. I expect that the bidding on this one will rise significantly
above $250 before it sells. The lens hood is annoying, and not
particularly effective, but optically and tactilly the lens is a joy
to use.

When I was looking for a lens to shoot dancing I was torn between the
FA31/1.8 and the sigma 30/1.4.  I didn't think that the 2/3 stop would
make a lot of difference. It turns out that it does, and I may end up
with the sigma if/when I find one for under $250 (and have $250 to
spend on it). It is one of my favorite lenses to use.

The PFA 50/1.4 is one of the best deals on a lens at $200 new. A
dealer in Canada actually had them for a bit less than that. They
never go for less than $185 on ebay. It is my understanding that it
has been discontinued, the replacement a 55/1.4 is supposed to be in
the FA 31 league for image quality, it's also $750. The 50/1.4 is
fast, reasonably sharp, reasonably small, and usuable as a long
"normal" or a short "portrait" lens. 

I just bought a DA 40/2.8 and love it. It is 1/4 the speed of the
50/1.4 (1/60 second at 1.4 means 1/15 at 2.8), so it isn't ideal for
low light situations. But it is sharp, gives nice pictures, is fast
enough for outdoors and will turn your K2000 into something that
easily fits into a purse, fanny pack or coat pocket. I picked mine up
for about $250. It's also faster than either of your zooms, though not
much.

I don't have, and haven't used, the 21 or the 43. The 43 is supposed
to be amazingly sharp. The 21 would be a better length for shooting
indoors, it's a bit wider. It's also a bit bigger physically than the
40, and IIRC f/3.2 rather than 2.8.

The FA 77 limited is perhaps my favorite lens to use, when it's the
right focal length. I find it perfect for portraits. I also often
enjoy using it when a shorter lens would nominally be ideal, because
it forces me to crop tighter for more interesting shots. I've seen
them new for under $600.

I have the D FA 50/2.8 macro. It does a great job as a macro lens, and
if you can get close enough to your subject will go to 1:1
magnification. I.e. 16mmx22mm (or whatever the actual numbers are)
will exactly fill the sensor.  I find myself wanting the D FA 100/2.8
macro instead, both for a bit more reach as a macro, and as a 100mm
prime. A photographer named Keitha who hangs out on the dpreview
pentax forum, does some amazing work with that lens.

People have been singing the praises lately of the DA 35/2 macro. It
works out as a reasonably fast "standard" on an APS sensor, goes in
tight as a macro, is reasonably fast, and quite sharp.

There are some things to look at when looking at Pentax lens model
designations. 

D (DA D-FA): means optimized for digital, will be auto focus, auto exposure
F or FA: imply 35mm film, the F, FA and FA-J lenses are also autofocus.
A star (*) means that there is something special about it.
limited means something special
DA*: are weather sealed
A, or A*: means that the lens works with automatic exposure cameras
and that the camera will know what aperture you are shooting at. Note
that you can use manual exposure lenses, but the camera won't know
what the aperture is.
The FA limited primes were basically a series of lenses to show that
Pentax was capable of making lenses as good as anyone else.
SDM means that the lens has its own focusing motor. It makes autofocus
quieter and faster.

M & K lenses are a completely manual.
M42 is screwmount, usuable with an adapter, but you have to manually
stop it down for setting exposure and shooting.

-- 
Every medium suffers from its own particular handicap. Photography's
greatest handicap is the ease with which the medium as such can be
learned. As a result, too many budding neophytes learn to speak the
language too long before they have anything to say."  W. Connell 1949

Larry Colen             [email protected]            http://www.red4est.com/lrc


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to