On Sat, 7 Mar 2009 13:37:00 -0500 Adam Maas <[email protected]> wrote:
> > like i said, no offence meant, i am really curious... > What I've been looking for is a body akin to the FE2 and FM2n, with > good high ISO performance (ISO 3200 minimum), decent resolution and a > viewfinder comparable to those bodies, along with compact size and > reasonable weight. Which is why I've been shuffling around so many > digital bodies (At last count, in order: *istD, D50, K100D, EOS 10D, > *istDS, K10D, D300 later with a D40 as a second body and now G1). thanks, Adam and i'll say it again, WOW! :-) i am pretty much a greenhorn when it comes to dslrs, i've just used the *ist DS and the K10D and in many ways i actually think the *ist DS was a much better camera for *me* (a more comfortable and a much more discreet size and better noise performance at >ISO 800 *and* better performance with the older manual lenses). and i *have* enjoyed reading, over the years, your varied experience on the different bodies/formats. one of the reasons i remembered most of them... :) regards, subash -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
