...i was addressing the original topic of "inexpensive photo printers",
most of which are not run color-managed
Then you're not talking about the Epson Photo line of printers.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
----- Original Message -----
From: "steve harley" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Inexpensive photo printers?
they whom i call Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
HP ink cartridges all come with a free return mailer so they go back to
HP and get recycled.
I bundle up all Epson ink cart empties and they go to the recycle center
whenever my "electronics and plastics" recycle box gets full.
good point; i bet some manufacturers will take the printers back
for recycling too (something a small fraction of people will take
advantage of)
There's no accounting the difference in print quality between what I can
get from a cheap print service and what the R2400 produces. But that's a
$700 printer, not a $100 printer. At 1000 A3s per year, average cost of
$2.85 per print in materials and now around 4000 prints down, the printer
has cost about $0.17 additional per print. $3 production cost for the
quality I'm getting out of the R2400 is quite reasonable.
agreed; i was addressing the original topic of "inexpensive photo
printers", most of which are not run color-managed, nor ever make
it to 4000 prints
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
