Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
----- Original Message -----
From: "frank theriault" <[email protected]>
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2009 1:49 PM
Subject: Re: PESO: Selling the green for the green
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 1:35 PM, Ken Waller <[email protected]> wrote:
So we should just do what our pets wants to do ?
Of course not! When did I say that?
The issue is about imposing something on an animal that he had no say
in. It's about imposing something on an animal for ~our~
entertainment. It's about imposing something on an animal that
~might~ have side-effects without him having a say in the matter.
It didn't sound like that in your initail post
The thing about it (other than the fact that it's possibly mildly toxic as
well as annoying for the
dog) is that the animal has no choice in the matter. A human can
weigh the pros and cons and decide if they want to do it; the dog
obviously has no say, so to impose something like that on it just
isn't fair, IMHO.
A human can weigh the pros and cons and decide if they want to do it
Sounded to me like you wanted to give the animal the choice. ;=}
That's quite a stretch from me saying that dying a dog green for St.
Patrick's Day is wrong to "we should do just what our pets wants us to
do".
cheers,
frank
Pardon me If I'm wrong, but that's the way I read it.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
