Those are exquisite, especially J. Thanks! -T On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 2:40 PM, DagT <[email protected]> wrote: > And why do companies like Ilford still sell lots of film? > > Some of us still use it: > J: > http://foto.no/linkeddata/bildekritikk/images/443000-443999/443614_1280x1024.jpg > T: > http://foto.no/linkeddata/bildekritikk/images/445000-445999/445718_1280x1024.jpg > L: > http://foto.no/linkeddata/bildekritikk/images/444000-444999/444154_1280x1024.jpg > > Bronica SQ-A, PS 180mm 1:4.5, Ilford HP5+ 120, Epson V700 > > .-) > > DagT > > Den 20. mars. 2009 kl. 22.01 skrev Nick Wright: > >> Now who's being ridiculous? >> >> If film is dead then why did Kodak make Ektar (now in 120 too)? Why >> did Fuji reintroduce Velvia? >> >> Why did a company show a new $1,600 enlarger at PMA? Why is >> Voigtlander still pumping out brand new rangefinders and lenses to go >> with? Not to mention their new Bessa III 6x7/6x6 rangefinder. >> >> Film is no more dead than painting is dead. It's just found a slightly >> different niche than it once had. >> >> On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 3:27 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Never mind the fundamental truth of photography today: film is dead. >> >> -- > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. >
-- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
