And why do companies like Ilford still sell lots of film?
Some of us still use it:
J:
http://foto.no/linkeddata/bildekritikk/images/443000-443999/443614_1280x1024.jpg
T:
http://foto.no/linkeddata/bildekritikk/images/445000-445999/445718_1280x1024.jpg
L:
http://foto.no/linkeddata/bildekritikk/images/444000-444999/444154_1280x1024.jpg
Bronica SQ-A, PS 180mm 1:4.5, Ilford HP5+ 120, Epson V700
.-)
DagT
Den 20. mars. 2009 kl. 22.01 skrev Nick Wright:
Now who's being ridiculous?
If film is dead then why did Kodak make Ektar (now in 120 too)? Why
did Fuji reintroduce Velvia?
Why did a company show a new $1,600 enlarger at PMA? Why is
Voigtlander still pumping out brand new rangefinders and lenses to go
with? Not to mention their new Bessa III 6x7/6x6 rangefinder.
Film is no more dead than painting is dead. It's just found a slightly
different niche than it once had.
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 3:27 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi <[email protected]>
wrote:
Never mind the fundamental truth of photography today: film is dead.
--
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
