if she was increasing in size, according to perspective, it would all be dull, pseudo-realistic, and therefore completely pointless. my version might be unsuccessful, but it has an intention and a motive for being this way perspective-size-wise
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 11:20 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > In a message dated 3/22/2009 3:04:34 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, > [email protected] writes: > a little tribute to rodchenko. > > http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3578/3377240694_520c19884c_o.jpg > > pentax k10d fa 50 1.4 > > ============ > I don't mind manipulated images, but this one doesn't cut it for me, because > the nearest ones are too small. I would prefer it with her in perspective > size-wise, repeated. > > Marnie aka Doe :-) (i.e. Some are going to say NO manipulation.) > > --------------------------------------------- > Warning: I am now filtering my email, so you may be censored. > > **************Feeling the pinch at the grocery store? Make meals for Under > $10. (http://food.aol.com/frugal-feasts?ncid=emlcntusfood00000002) > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
