well, it's kind of pointless giving a comment on a tribute, suggesting a crucial change to the image, without even checking-out who is the tribute to. and rodchenko is a very important photographer, btw, not some half-known guy.
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 11:28 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > In a message dated 3/22/2009 3:25:56 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, > [email protected] writes: > if she was increasing in size, according to perspective, it would all > be dull, pseudo-realistic, and therefore completely pointless. my > version might be unsuccessful, but it has an intention and a motive > for being this way perspective-size-wise. > ================ > Uh huh. I think she could be sort of Magritte-style the other way. Your pic, > though. > > And I don't know who rodchenko is. > > Marnie aka Doe :-) > > > --------------------------------------------- > Warning: I am now filtering my email, so you may be censored. > > **************Feeling the pinch at the grocery store? Make meals for Under > $10. (http://food.aol.com/frugal-feasts?ncid=emlcntusfood00000002) > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
